Wednesday, August 20, 2008

search site: 

CALL: 213.384.1400

 
Stop Prisoner Rape
 
 
 
ABOUT
Mission Statement
Board & Staff
SPR History
Contact
MEDIA
Press Releases
Press Contact
SPR in the News
PUBLICATIONS
  Action Update
PREA Update
SPR Reports
Fact Sheets
RESOURCES
Survivor Resource Guide
Survivor Testimony
Self Help Resources
Legal Resources
Academic Articles
Books & Reports
PROGRAMS
DONATE
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES

 


SPR IN THE NEWS - 2002

 

Julia Scheeres, Prison's Printed Web Info OK for Inmates, Wired News, Sept. 11, 2002.

A U.S. District Court in San Francisco has struck down a California prison policy that bars inmates from receiving material printed from the Internet.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California sued the state on behalf of Pelican Bay prisoner Frank Clement, who claimed that the policy violated his First Amendment rights.

Clement brought the case against the California Department of Corrections after he was prohibited from using an Internet pen pal service that allows inmates to post personal ads online and receive correspondence via snail mail.

California prisoners don't have direct Internet access. A CDC spokesman said that the regulation was implemented after prison mailrooms were flooded with letters containing printouts of Web pages and e-mail messages. The volume of mail created a burden on prison staff screening inmate correspondence. He also claimed that anonymous e-mail created a security risk because it was less traceable than U.S. mail and could contain "coded correspondence" used to plan crimes outside the prison.

The court ruled that there wasn't enough evidence to support the CDC's allegations, and entered a permanent injunction to stop the state from applying the regulation.

"A prisoner's constitutional right to receive information by incoming mail is undisputed," U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken wrote in her Sept. 9 decision. The ruling affects eight prisons that had adopted the policy.

Wilken said prison regulations can only impinge on this right if there is a "valid, rational connection" between the policy and a legitimate security interest, and that the CDC failed to make that connection.

She added: "There are, in short, recognized rehabilitative benefits to permitting prisoners to receive educational reading material and maintain contact with the world outside the prison gates."

"It's a tremendously significant decision," said ACLU staff attorney Ann Brick, who represented Clement. "A lot of information that is valuable to prisoners can only be found online."

Many advocacy groups, such as Stop Prisoner Rape, are Internet based, and inmates have no way of accessing the information unless someone prints it out and sends it to them, she said.

In a related case, the ACLU is suing the Arizona Department of Corrections on First Amendment grounds for a policy that bans inmates from publishing information online, such as pen pal requests or personal Web pages.

 
 

3325 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 340
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Phone: (213) 384-1400
Fax: (213) 384-1411
Web & Application Development by ThinkLogic, LLC.